On Tue, Jun 13 2023 at 22:03, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 6/13/2023 4:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> @@ -2396,6 +2393,13 @@ void __init arch_cpu_finalize_init(void)
>> '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Must be before alternatives because it might set or clear
>> + * feature bits.
>> + */
>> + fpu__init_system();
>> + fpu__init_cpu();
>
> fpu__init_cpu() appears to be duplicated here because fpu__init_system()
> invoked this already:
>
> void __init fpu__init_system(void)
> {
> ...
> /*
> * The FPU has to be operational for some of the
> * later FPU init activities:
> */
> fpu__init_cpu();
Well, that's _before_ xstate initialization and I couldn't convince
myself that it's good enough. All of this is such a horrible mess...
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
