On 06/06, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> writes: > > > However the patch looks fine to me, just the word "buggy" looks a bit > > too strong imo. > > I guess I am in general agreement. Perhaps I can just say they values > are wrong by definition?
Up to you. I won't really argue with "buggy". Oleg. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
