The signal number to resume with is already in si_signo.  So instead
of placing an extra copy in tsk->exit_code and later reading the extra
copy from tsk->exit_code just read si_signo.

Read si_signo in ptrace_do_notify where it is easy as the siginfo is a
local variable.  Only ptrace_report_syscall cares about the signal to
resume with from ptrace_stop and it calls ptrace_notify which calls
ptrace_do_notify so moving the actual work into ptrace_do_notify where
it is easier is not a problem.

With ptrace_stop not being involved in returning the signal to tracer
asked the tracee to resume with remove the comment and the return
code from ptrace_stop.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
---
 kernel/ptrace.c |  1 -
 kernel/signal.c | 13 ++++---------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index a0a07d140751..e0ecb1536dfc 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ static void ptrace_set_signr(struct task_struct *child, 
unsigned int signr)
 {
        struct kernel_siginfo *info = child->last_siginfo;
 
-       child->exit_code = signr;
        /*
         * Update the siginfo structure if the signal has
         * changed.  If the debugger wanted something
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 3d955c23b13d..2cc45e8448e2 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2186,12 +2186,8 @@ static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct 
*tsk,
  * We always set current->last_siginfo while stopped here.
  * That makes it a way to test a stopped process for
  * being ptrace-stopped vs being job-control-stopped.
- *
- * Returns the signal the ptracer requested the code resume
- * with.  If the code did not stop because the tracer is gone,
- * the stop signal remains unchanged unless clear_code.
  */
-static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned long message,
+static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned long message,
                       kernel_siginfo_t *info)
        __releases(&current->sighand->siglock)
        __acquires(&current->sighand->siglock)
@@ -2219,7 +2215,7 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned 
long message,
         * signals here to prevent ptrace_stop sleeping in schedule.
         */
        if (!current->ptrace || __fatal_signal_pending(current))
-               return exit_code;
+               return;
 
        set_special_state(TASK_TRACED);
        current->jobctl |= JOBCTL_TRACED;
@@ -2302,7 +2298,6 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned 
long message,
         * any signal-sending on another CPU that wants to examine it.
         */
        spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-       exit_code = current->exit_code;
        current->last_siginfo = NULL;
        current->ptrace_message = 0;
        current->exit_code = 0;
@@ -2316,7 +2311,6 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned 
long message,
         * This sets TIF_SIGPENDING, but never clears it.
         */
        recalc_sigpending_tsk(current);
-       return exit_code;
 }
 
 static int ptrace_do_notify(int signr, int exit_code, int why, unsigned long 
message)
@@ -2330,7 +2324,8 @@ static int ptrace_do_notify(int signr, int exit_code, int 
why, unsigned long mes
        info.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(current_user_ns(), current_uid());
 
        /* Let the debugger run.  */
-       return ptrace_stop(exit_code, why, message, &info);
+       ptrace_stop(exit_code, why, message, &info);
+       return info.si_signo;
 }
 
 int ptrace_notify(int exit_code, unsigned long message)
-- 
2.35.3


_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um

Reply via email to