Hi Borislav, On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:59 PM Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you > > or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say. > > Which would you like? > > We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you > might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a > new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is > appreciated. :)
Okay, no problem. I'll make the change there and get_cycles() for v+1 of the patchset. Jason _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
