Hi Rob, On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:40 PM Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote: > Moving this check to get_cycles() implementation would eliminate the > RiscV implementation of random_get_entropy() if you follow my other > suggestion.
Not an option. random_get_entropy() != get_cycles(). Sometimes these are different functions. Returning random_get_entropy_fallback() from get_cycles(), for example, wouldn't make any sense. Jason _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
