On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > In the event that random_get_entropy() can't access a cycle counter or > similar, falling back to returning 0 is really not the best we can do. > Instead, at least calling random_get_entropy_fallback() would be > preferable, because that always needs to return _something_, even > falling back to jiffies eventually. It's not as though > random_get_entropy_fallback() is super high precision or guaranteed to > be entropic, but basically anything that's not zero all the time is > better than returning zero all the time. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de> > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> > --- > arch/mips/include/asm/timex.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/timex.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/timex.h > index b05bb70a2e46..abc60a6395e3 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/timex.h > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/timex.h > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long random_get_entropy(void) > else if (likely(imp != PRID_IMP_R6000 && imp != PRID_IMP_R6000A)) > return read_c0_random(); > else > - return 0; /* no usable register */ > + return random_get_entropy_fallback(); /* no usable register */ > } > #define random_get_entropy random_get_entropy > > -- > 2.35.1
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de> -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ] _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
