On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 01:23:18PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > It's not necessary to declare these functions static inline as they are > contained within a single compilation unit.
FWIW I don't think it's technically strictly equivalent (I have a vague memory of inline lightly suggesting inlining a function to GCC, because of compat reasons). Anyway, doesn't really matter, practically any static function gets inlined with -O2 anyway. > > This makes the anonymous interval tree code consistent with the newly > updated file-backed interval tree code. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]> -- Pedro
