On 2026/5/27 22:06, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Add a sysctl panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure (disabled by
> default) that triggers a kernel panic when memory_failure()
> encounters pages that cannot be recovered.  This provides a clean
> crash with useful debug information rather than allowing silent
> data corruption or a delayed crash at an unrelated code path.
> 
> Panic eligibility is intentionally narrow: only MF_MSG_KERNEL with
> result == MF_IGNORED panics.  After the previous patch, MF_MSG_KERNEL
> covers PG_reserved pages and the kernel-owned pages promoted from
> get_hwpoison_page() via -ENOTRECOVERABLE (slab, page tables,
> large-kmalloc).
> 
> All other action types are excluded:
> 
> - MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON and MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER can be reached by
>   transient refcount races with the page allocator (an in-flight buddy
>   allocation has refcount 0 and is no longer on the buddy free list,
>   briefly), and panicking on them would risk killing the box for what
>   is actually a recoverable userspace page.
> 
> - MF_MSG_UNKNOWN means identify_page_state() could not classify the
>   page; that is precisely the wrong basis for a panic decision.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 14c0a958638c..dcd53dbc6aec 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery __read_mostly = 1;
>  
>  static int sysctl_enable_soft_offline __read_mostly = 1;
>  
> +static int sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf __read_mostly;
> +
>  atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
>  
>  static bool hw_memory_failure __read_mostly = false;
> @@ -155,6 +157,15 @@ static const struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
>               .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec_minmax,
>               .extra1         = SYSCTL_ZERO,
>               .extra2         = SYSCTL_ONE,
> +     },
> +     {
> +             .procname       = "panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure",
> +             .data           = &sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf,
> +             .maxlen         = sizeof(sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf),
> +             .mode           = 0644,
> +             .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> +             .extra1         = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> +             .extra2         = SYSCTL_ONE,
>       }
>  };
>  
> @@ -1255,6 +1266,15 @@ static void update_per_node_mf_stats(unsigned long pfn,
>       ++mf_stats->total;
>  }
>  
> +static bool panic_on_unrecoverable_mf(enum mf_action_page_type type,
> +                                   enum mf_result result)
> +{
> +     if (!sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf || result != MF_IGNORED)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return type == MF_MSG_KERNEL;

Would it be more straightforward to write as something like:

if (!sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf)
        return false;

return (type == MF_MSG_KERNEL && result == MF_IGNORED);

Thanks.
.

Reply via email to