Ihor and Kumar reported splat from ftrace_get_addr_curr [1], which happened
because of the missing ftrace_lock in update_ftrace_direct_add/del functions
allowing concurrent access to ftrace internals.
The ftrace_update_ops function must be guarded by ftrace_lock, adding that.
Fixes: 05dc5e9c1fe1 ("ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function")
Fixes: 8d2c1233f371 ("ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function")
Reported-by: Ihor Solodrai <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Tested-by: Ihor Solodrai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 827fb9a0bf0d..8baf61c9be6d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -6404,6 +6404,7 @@ int update_ftrace_direct_add(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
struct ftrace_hash *hash)
new_filter_hash = old_filter_hash;
}
} else {
+ guard(mutex)(&ftrace_lock);
err = ftrace_update_ops(ops, new_filter_hash, EMPTY_HASH);
/*
* new_filter_hash is dup-ed, so we need to release it anyway,
@@ -6530,6 +6531,7 @@ int update_ftrace_direct_del(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
struct ftrace_hash *hash)
ops->func_hash->filter_hash = NULL;
}
} else {
+ guard(mutex)(&ftrace_lock);
err = ftrace_update_ops(ops, new_filter_hash, EMPTY_HASH);
/*
* new_filter_hash is dup-ed, so we need to release it anyway,
--
2.53.0
