On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:51:56 +0100 Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:34:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:09:26 +0900 > > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org> > > > > > > Use ftrace_regs instead of fgraph_ret_regs for tracing return value > > > on function_graph tracer because of simplifying the callback interface. > > > > > > The CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL is also replaced by > > > CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org> > > > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com> > > > > Did Heiko ack this? I don't see it in my inbox. > > Yes, I did: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240916121656.20933-b-...@linux.ibm.com/ Oh OK. I didn't go back that far as it appeared you questioned this patch in v16: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241016083323.16801-a-...@linux.ibm.com/ > > > Heiko, > > > > Does the above look OK to you? > > Looks still good to me. Thanks, I'll likely pull in the series after rc4 and get it ready for linux-next. -- Steve
