On 07/02/17 11:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:27:38AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>>
>> The check on rcode >= 0 is always true because rcode is unsigned
>> and can never be less than zero. Remove the redundant check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> index 3b5ddf4..ddfd726 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> @@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ int aac_report_phys_luns(struct aac_dev *dev, struct
>> fib *fibptr, int rescan)
>> FsaNormal, 1, 1, NULL, NULL);
>>
>> /* analyse data */
>> - if (rcode >= 0 && phys_luns->resp_flag == 2) {
>
> The original code is buggy. rcode should be an int.
Thanks for spotting that. Oops.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
