On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 11:13 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 09:16 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > @@ -580,8 +580,8 @@ static int sdebug_sectors_per; /
> > * sectors per cylinder */
> >
> > static unsigned int scsi_debug_lbp(void)
> > {
> > - return ((0 == scsi_debug_fake_rw) &&
> > - (scsi_debug_lbpu | scsi_debug_lbpws |
> > scsi_debug_lbpws10));
> > + return ((0 == sdebug_fake_rw) &&
> > + (sdebug_lbpu | sdebug_lbpws | sdebug_lbpws10));
> > }
>
> Since you are changing this code, please remove the superfluous
> parentheses, place the constant at the right side of the comparison
> and change "|" into "||" since the intention of the above code is to
> perform a logical or and this code is not in a performance-critical
> path.
This is getting completely pointless. We're not slaves to checkpatch
and the Maintainer has considerable leeway to decide the style for
their code. I personally don't like the const == rvalue form of compar
ison, but it does pick up an erroneous '=' instead of '==', so I'm not
going to object to a maintainer who wishes to use it.
Plus, if you only alter it in one place, the file becomes a mess of
styles and thus harder to read.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
