On 2/24/2014 9:30 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 22:53 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
In T10-PI support we will have memory keys for protection
buffers and signature transactions. We prefer to compact
indicators rather than keeping multiple bools.

This commit does not change any functionality.

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@mellanox.com>
---
  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h  |    8 ++++++--
  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c |    4 ++--
  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c  |    2 +-
  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h 
b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
index 5ffa92f..5f7dbfd 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
@@ -280,13 +280,17 @@ struct iser_device {
                                                            enum iser_data_dir 
cmd_dir);
  };
+enum iser_reg_indicator {
+       ISER_DATA_KEY_VALID = 1 << 0,
+};
+
  struct fast_reg_descriptor {
        struct list_head                  list;
        /* For fast registration - FRWR */
        struct ib_mr                     *data_mr;
        struct ib_fast_reg_page_list     *data_frpl;
-       /* Valid for fast registration flag */
-       bool                              valid;
+       /* registration indicators container */
+       u8                                reg_indicators;
  };
struct iser_conn {
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
index 0e029fe..3edab18 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static int iser_fast_reg_mr(struct iscsi_iser_task 
*iser_task,
                return -EINVAL;
        }
- if (!desc->valid) {
+       if (!(desc->reg_indicators & ISER_DATA_KEY_VALID)) {
                memset(&inv_wr, 0, sizeof(inv_wr));
                inv_wr.wr_id = ISER_FRWR_LI_WRID;
                inv_wr.opcode = IB_WR_LOCAL_INV;
This block doesn't apply either..

ISER_FRWR_LI_WRID does not appear to be defined anywhere in v3.14-rc2
code..?  Is this patch missing a new definition..?
Er, missed the bit wrt:

    IB/iser: Suppress completion for fast registration work requests

Applied along with ib_iser + ib_isert patches to target-pending/rdma-dif

--nab

OK, I see you got the missing piece.
This fixes all your conflicts right (I verified it before myself)?

Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to