On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> In T10-PI support we will have memory keys for protection
> buffers and signature transactions. We prefer to compact
> indicators rather than keeping multiple bools.
> 
> This commit does not change any functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h  |    8 ++++++--
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c |    4 ++--
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c  |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h 
> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
> index 5ffa92f..5f7dbfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
> @@ -280,13 +280,17 @@ struct iser_device {
>                                                           enum iser_data_dir 
> cmd_dir);
>  };
>  
> +enum iser_reg_indicator {
> +     ISER_DATA_KEY_VALID = 1 << 0,
> +};
> +
>  struct fast_reg_descriptor {
>       struct list_head                  list;
>       /* For fast registration - FRWR */
>       struct ib_mr                     *data_mr;
>       struct ib_fast_reg_page_list     *data_frpl;
> -     /* Valid for fast registration flag */
> -     bool                              valid;
> +     /* registration indicators container */
> +     u8                                reg_indicators;
>  };
>  
>  struct iser_conn {
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c 
> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
> index 0e029fe..3edab18 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static int iser_fast_reg_mr(struct iscsi_iser_task 
> *iser_task,
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> -     if (!desc->valid) {
> +     if (!(desc->reg_indicators & ISER_DATA_KEY_VALID)) {
>               memset(&inv_wr, 0, sizeof(inv_wr));
>               inv_wr.wr_id = ISER_FRWR_LI_WRID;
>               inv_wr.opcode = IB_WR_LOCAL_INV;

This block doesn't apply either..

ISER_FRWR_LI_WRID does not appear to be defined anywhere in v3.14-rc2
code..?  Is this patch missing a new definition..?

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to