On 09/24/2013 10:51 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 08/29/2013 09:06 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Hi James, >> >> On 08/07/2013 08:43 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote: >>> Hi, James: >>> >>> On 07/11/2013 04:35 AM, Ewan Milne wrote: >>>> Looks good. We have been testing this extensively. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Ewan D. Milne<emi...@redhat.com> >>> Do you think this patchset can be applied? If so, When? Perhaps you >>> are waiting for someone's feedback? >>> >>> We've also tested and got the duration could be shortened from 6m26s >>> to 44s when 'eh_deadline' was set as 1s(the minimum value of >>> timeout) >>> and 16M data were written(I/O processing time can be ignored - >>> 0.7s). >>> >>> As Ewan said, this is efficient to fast failover policy for >>> redundant >>> environments. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ren >> Any objections to this patchset? >> I have other patchsets pending (eg asynchronous command aborts) >> which are based on this one. >> So it would be good to have a status here. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hannes > > Any progress on this patchset? Seems to have gone dormant? > Not for the lack of trying on my side ...
Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
