Hi James, On 08/07/2013 08:43 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote: > Hi, James: > > On 07/11/2013 04:35 AM, Ewan Milne wrote: >> Looks good. We have been testing this extensively. >> >> Acked-by: Ewan D. Milne<emi...@redhat.com> > > Do you think this patchset can be applied? If so, When? Perhaps you > are waiting for someone's feedback? > > We've also tested and got the duration could be shortened from 6m26s > to 44s when 'eh_deadline' was set as 1s(the minimum value of timeout) > and 16M data were written(I/O processing time can be ignored - 0.7s). > > As Ewan said, this is efficient to fast failover policy for redundant > environments. > > Thanks, > Ren
Any objections to this patchset? I have other patchsets pending (eg asynchronous command aborts) which are based on this one. So it would be good to have a status here. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
