On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:40 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 7/23/2013 6:33 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 17:17 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > >> On 7/23/2013 5:00 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > >>>>> The slot->response value may not be aligned, so should be read > >>>>> using the appropriate kernel "unaligned" accessor. > >>> Hm, institutional memory re-presenting the wrong patch? However, I am > >>> reminded to push the right one in spite of no ack from marvell. > >> You may be right; the original author of that patch is not me, but someone > >> else here at Tilera. > >> > >> That said, the version I pushed is effectively the version we have in the > >> tip of our tree, so if we've ended up carrying the wrong patch, that's > >> bad! Let me know what the right patch is that you have - thanks. > > This is what I have. > > Thanks, I've merged the optimization back into our tree :-)
Well it was originally a compile fix and a fast path optimisation. I notice the compile fix made it back. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
