On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The slot->response value may not be aligned, so should be read
> using the appropriate kernel "unaligned" accessor.
Hm, institutional memory re-presenting the wrong patch? However, I am
reminded to push the right one in spite of no ack from marvell.
James
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@tilera.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c
> index f14665a..66aaa87 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c
> @@ -1858,10 +1858,11 @@ int mvs_slot_complete(struct mvs_info *mvi, u32
> rx_desc, u32 flags)
> }
>
> /* error info record present */
> - if (unlikely((rx_desc & RXQ_ERR) && (*(u64 *) slot->response))) {
> + if (unlikely((rx_desc & RXQ_ERR) &&
> + get_unaligned_le64((u64 *) slot->response))) {
> mv_dprintk("port %d slot %d rx_desc %X has error info"
> "%016llX.\n", slot->port->sas_port.id, slot_idx,
> - rx_desc, (u64)(*(u64 *)slot->response));
> + rx_desc, get_unaligned_le64((u64 *)slot->response));
> tstat->stat = mvs_slot_err(mvi, task, slot_idx);
> tstat->resp = SAS_TASK_COMPLETE;
> goto out;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.h
> index 60e2fb7..d6b19dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> #include <scsi/libsas.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_tcq.h>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
