Am 02.10.2012 22:30, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 11:22 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Clang warns about this bug:
>> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c:52:45: warning: operator '?:'
>> has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first
>> [-Wparentheses]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> Please review this very carefully because I haven't tested it. It could
>> be that the check should be:
>> (data_done + data_length > FirstBurstLength) ? FirstBurstLength :
>> data_length);
>> Instead of what I have which is:
>> data_done + (data_length > FirstBurstLength ? FirstBurstLength :
>> data_length);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
>> b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
>> index 1a02016..2067efd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
>> @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ void iscsit_set_dataout_sequence_values(
>> if (cmd->unsolicited_data) {
>> cmd->seq_start_offset = cmd->write_data_done;
>> cmd->seq_end_offset = (cmd->write_data_done +
>> - (cmd->se_cmd.data_length >
>> - conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength) ?
>> - conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength :
>> cmd->se_cmd.data_length);
>> + ((cmd->se_cmd.data_length >
>> + conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength) ?
>> + conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength :
>> cmd->se_cmd.data_length));
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> --
>
> This is indeed the original intention and your patch is correct, so
> applied to for-next.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --nab
>
please consider rewriting this into an if ... else ... statement.
See my comments and Dan's reply on this.
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
