On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 11:22 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Clang warns about this bug:
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c:52:45: warning: operator '?:'
>       has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first
>       [-Wparentheses]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> ---
> Please review this very carefully because I haven't tested it.  It could
> be that the check should be:
> (data_done + data_length > FirstBurstLength) ? FirstBurstLength : 
> data_length);
> Instead of what I have which is:
> data_done + (data_length > FirstBurstLength ? FirstBurstLength : data_length);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c 
> b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
> index 1a02016..2067efd 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl0.c
> @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ void iscsit_set_dataout_sequence_values(
>       if (cmd->unsolicited_data) {
>               cmd->seq_start_offset = cmd->write_data_done;
>               cmd->seq_end_offset = (cmd->write_data_done +
> -                     (cmd->se_cmd.data_length >
> -                      conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength) ?
> -                     conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength : 
> cmd->se_cmd.data_length);
> +                     ((cmd->se_cmd.data_length >
> +                       conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength) ?
> +                      conn->sess->sess_ops->FirstBurstLength : 
> cmd->se_cmd.data_length));
>               return;
>       }
>  
> --

This is indeed the original intention and your patch is correct, so
applied to for-next.

Thank you!

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to