On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 07:24 -0700, Mark Haverkamp wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 07:40 -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > > In these cases, the 'addr' is an u64, so is it necessary to perform this > > modification? > > Arjan, > > Do you agree with the above? If so, is the patch OK as is?
Ok you're ok then. I just then in turn question why addr is actually a u64, and not say, a dma_addr_t or something.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
