On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:04:46PM +0800, dongchun....@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun....@mediatek.com>
> 
> This patch mainly adds two more sensor modes for OV8856 CMOS image sensor.
> That is, the resolution of 1632*1224 and 3264*2448, corresponding to the 
> bayer order of BGGR.
> The sensor revision also differs in some OTP register.

> +static int __ov8856_power_on(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> +{
> +     struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov8856->sd);
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = clk_prepare_enable(ov8856->xvclk);
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable xvclk\n");
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->n_shutdn_gpio, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> +
> +     ret = regulator_bulk_enable(OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES, ov8856->supplies);
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable regulators\n");
> +             goto disable_clk;
> +     }
> +
> +     gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->n_shutdn_gpio, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +

> +     usleep_range(1400, 1500);

This should be commented why this is needed and from where the requirement
comes from. Also, not, that 100us, which is only ~7%, is small margin.
Recommended one is ~20%.

> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +disable_clk:
> +     clk_disable_unprepare(ov8856->xvclk);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}

> +     ov8856->is_1B_revision = (val == OV8856_1B_MODULE) ? 1 : 0;

!! will give same result without using ternary operator.

> +     ov8856->xvclk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "xvclk");
> +     if (IS_ERR(ov8856->xvclk)) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get xvclk\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }

Previously it was optional.
How did it work before and why it's not optional?

> +     ov8856->n_shutdn_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&client->dev, "reset",
> +                                            GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> +     if (IS_ERR(ov8856->n_shutdn_gpio)) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get reset-gpios\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }

Ditto.

> +static const struct of_device_id ov8856_of_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "ovti,ov8856" },

> +     {},

No comma needed for terminator line.

> +};

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Reply via email to