On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:01:21PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> The virtual counter value is updated during pmu_ctr_read. There is no need
> to update it in reset case. Otherwise, it will be counted twice which is
> incorrect.
> 
> Fixes: 0cb74b65d2e5 ("RISC-V: KVM: Implement perf support without sampling")
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <a...@brainfault.org>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <ati...@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> index 86391a5061dd..b1574c043f77 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> unsigned long ctr_base,
>  {
>       struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>       int i, pmc_index, sbiret = 0;
> -     u64 enabled, running;
>       struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
>       int fevent_code;
>  
> @@ -432,12 +431,9 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> unsigned long ctr_base,
>                               sbiret = SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED;
>                       }
>  
> -                     if (flags & SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET) {
> -                             /* Relase the counter if this is a reset 
> request */
> -                             pmc->counter_val += 
> perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event,
> -                                                                       
> &enabled, &running);
> +                     if (flags & SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET)
> +                             /* Release the counter if this is a reset 
> request */
>                               kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> -                     }
>               } else {
>                       sbiret = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
>               }
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajo...@ventanamicro.com>

Reply via email to