From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:49:08 +0100
> So i dont support the scheme proposed here, the blatant bending of the > priority scale towards the TCP workload. I don't support this scheme either ;-) That's why my proposal is to find a way to allow input packet processing even during tcp_recvmsg() work. It is a solution that would give the TCP task exactly it's time slice, no more, no less, without the erroneous behavior of sleeping with packets held in the socket backlog. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
