* Wenji Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The solution is really simple and needs no kernel change at all: if
> >you want the TCP receiver to get a larger share of timeslices then
> >either renice it to -20 or renice the other tasks to +19.
>
> Simply give a larger share of timeslices to the TCP receiver won't
> solve the problem. No matter what the timeslice is, if the TCP
> receiving process has packets within backlog, and the process is
> expired and moved to the expired array, RTO might happen in the TCP
> sender.
if you still have the test-setup, could you nevertheless try setting the
priority of the receiving TCP task to nice -20 and see what kind of
performance you get?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
