On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:37:18PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > find out the pending updates from update_process_times() itself and pass > > > it to scheduler_tick() which is the one interested in it. > > > > tick_nohz_handler() calls tick_sched_handler() ?! > > > > And tick_nohz_handler() actually computes the number of ticks -- which > > we then happily ignore. > > > > Why compute it again a few functions down? > > i think so. > > additionally, i think it would be better to assume that scheduler_tick() > handles 1 tick as peter said e.g. because of virt, and to handle the > case caused by full NOHZ *in the nohz related code*.
You mean "not to assume" right? > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
