-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------

From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

H.323 connection tracking code calls ip_ct_refresh_acct() when
processing RCFs and URQs but passes NULL as the skb.
When CONFIG_IP_NF_CT_ACCT is enabled, the connection tracking core tries
to derefence the skb, which results in an obvious panic.
A similar fix was applied on the SIP connection tracking code some time
ago.

Signed-off-by: Faidon Liambotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
commit 76b0c2b63fd5a2da358b36a22b7bf99298dde0b7
tree cd96ddb4c4cd5ffb44ed5a47fa3be41267eea99a
parent 1b9bb3c14c60324b54645ffefbe6d270f9fd191c
author Faidon Liambotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:01:25 +0100
committer Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:01:25 +0100

 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.18.4.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c
+++ linux-2.6.18.4/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static int process_rcf(struct sk_buff **
                DEBUGP
                    ("ip_ct_ras: set RAS connection timeout to %u seconds\n",
                     info->timeout);
-               ip_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, NULL, info->timeout * HZ);
+               ip_ct_refresh(ct, *pskb, info->timeout * HZ);
 
                /* Set expect timeout */
                read_lock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static int process_urq(struct sk_buff **
        info->sig_port[!dir] = 0;
 
        /* Give it 30 seconds for UCF or URJ */
-       ip_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, NULL, 30 * HZ);
+       ip_ct_refresh(ct, *pskb, 30 * HZ);
 
        return 0;
 }

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to