On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:43:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > @@ -167,42 +307,18 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
> >
> > > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> >
> > This again reminds me that we should move rcu_note_context_switch()
> > under the IRQ disable section the scheduler already has or remove the
> > IRQ disable from rcu_note_context_switch().
>
> Ah, this is the unlikely path where we actually need to do work. The
> normal fast paths no longer require IRQs disabled, you already fixed
> that last time, good!
But why not make the less-likely paths a bit cheaper while we are at it? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
