Your subject is really "odd", it doesn't really describe what you are doing in a single line, it just has a file name in it :(
What did you use to generate these? I got a few duplicates, and there isn't a "leading" 0 for the first 9 patches. git can spit these out correctly very simply, I recommend using that in the future. On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 03:57:08PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > While not a problem in itself, I was not sure why 'echo space' was used. > Not being aware of any immediate benefits to this, I thought using > 'echo' by itself would suffice in printing a newline, which I believe is > the desired behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> > --- > --- linux/scripts/ver_linux.orig 2015-10-03 13:41:57.118790241 +0300 > +++ linux/scripts/ver_linux 2015-10-03 13:43:38.587271851 +0300 > @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ > # > echo 'If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.' > echo 'Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes.' > -echo ' ' > +echo > > uname -a > -echo ' ' > +echo Can you respin these patches with correct subject lines, based on this, and the other feedback you have gotten and resend them? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/