On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:33:11 +0530 Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> 
wrote:

> This is purely cosmetic, just makes code more readable
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -30,9 +30,20 @@ extern int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct 
> *vma,
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_SET_ACCESS_FLAGS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>  extern int pmdp_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                                unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp,
>                                pmd_t entry, int dirty);
> +#else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +static inline int pmdp_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +                                     unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp,
> +                                     pmd_t entry, int dirty)
> +{
> +     BUG();
> +     return 0;
> +}

Is it possible to simply leave this undefined?  So the kernel fails at
link time?

> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c

Good heavens that file is a mess.  Your patch does improve it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to