On 09/11/2015 09:27 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I'm inclined to echo Vlastimil's comment from earlier in the thread:
> sounds like an overkill, unless we find something more serious than this.

I've modified my tests to stress the exit path of processes with many vmas,
and hit the following NULL ptr deref (not sure if it's related to the original 
issue):

[1181047.935563] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory 
accessgeneral protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN
[1181047.937223] Modules linked in:
[1181047.937772] CPU: 4 PID: 21912 Comm: trinity-c341 Not tainted 
4.3.0-rc1-next-20150914-sasha-00043-geddd763-dirty #2554
[1181047.939387] task: ffff8804195c8000 ti: ffff880433f00000 task.ti: 
ffff880433f00000
[1181047.940533] RIP: unmap_vmas (mm/memory.c:1337)
[1181047.941842] RSP: 0000:ffff880433f078a8  EFLAGS: 00010206
[1181047.942383] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88041acd000a RCX: 
ffffffffffffffff
[1181047.943091] RDX: 0000000000000099 RSI: ffff88041acd000a RDI: 
00000000000004c8
[1181047.943889] RBP: ffff880433f078d8 R08: ffff880415c59c58 R09: 
0000000015c59e01
[1181047.944604] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 
ffffffffffffffff
[1181047.944833] pps pps0: PPS event at 21837.866101174
[1181047.944838] pps pps0: capture assert seq #7188
[1181047.946261] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff880433f07910 R15: 
0000000000002e0d
[1181047.947005] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880252000000(0000) 
knlGS:0000000000000000
[1181047.947779] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[1181047.948361] CR2: 000000000097df90 CR3: 000000044e08c000 CR4: 
00000000000006a0
[1181047.949085] Stack:
[1181047.949350]  0000000000000000 ffff880433f07910 1ffff100867e0f1e 
dffffc0000000000
[1181047.950164]  ffff8801d825d000 0000000000002e0d ffff880433f079d0 
ffffffff9276c4ab
[1181047.951070]  ffff88041acd000a 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff9ecd1a43 
ffffffff9276c2a0
[1181047.951906] Call Trace:
[1181047.952201] exit_mmap (mm/mmap.c:2856)
[1181047.952751] ? SyS_remap_file_pages (mm/mmap.c:2826)
[1181047.953633] ? __khugepaged_exit (./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:118 
include/linux/sched.h:2557 mm/huge_memory.c:2169)
[1181047.954281] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held (kernel/rcu/update.c:109)
[1181047.954936] ? kmem_cache_free (include/trace/events/kmem.h:143 
mm/slub.c:2746)
[1181047.955535] ? __khugepaged_exit (./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:118 
include/linux/sched.h:2557 mm/huge_memory.c:2169)
[1181047.956204] mmput (include/linux/compiler.h:207 kernel/fork.c:735 
kernel/fork.c:702)
[1181047.956691] do_exit (./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:311 
include/linux/thread_info.h:91 kernel/exit.c:438 kernel/exit.c:733)
[1181047.957241] ? lockdep_init (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3298)
[1181047.958005] ? mm_update_next_owner (kernel/exit.c:654)
[1181047.959007] ? debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:57)
[1181047.959995] ? get_lock_stats (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:249)
[1181047.960885] ? lockdep_init (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3298)
[1181047.961438] ? __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock (??:?)
[1181047.962573] ? lock_release (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3641)
[1181047.963488] ? __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock (??:?)
[1181047.964704] do_group_exit (./arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 
kernel/exit.c:859)
[1181047.965569] get_signal (kernel/signal.c:2353)
[1181047.966430] do_signal (arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709)
[1181047.967241] ? do_readv_writev (include/linux/fsnotify.h:223 
fs/read_write.c:821)
[1181047.968169] ? v9fs_file_lock_dotl (fs/9p/vfs_file.c:407)
[1181047.969126] ? vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:777)
[1181047.969955] ? setup_sigcontext (arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:706)
[1181047.970916] ? __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock (??:?)
[1181047.972139] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (lib/smp_processor_id.c:63)
[1181047.973489] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:95 
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:171 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:199)
[1181047.974160] ? do_setitimer (include/linux/spinlock.h:357 
kernel/time/itimer.c:227)
[1181047.974818] ? check_preemption_disabled (lib/smp_processor_id.c:18)
[1181047.975480] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (lib/smp_processor_id.c:63)
[1181047.976142] prepare_exit_to_usermode (arch/x86/entry/common.c:251)
[1181047.976784] syscall_return_slowpath (arch/x86/entry/common.c:318)
[1181047.977473] int_ret_from_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:282)
[1181047.978116] Code: 08 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 22 01 00 00 48 8b 43 40 48 8d b8 c8 
04 00 00 48 89 45 d0 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 
02 00 0f 85 ee 00 00 00 48 8b 45 d0 48 83 b8 c8 04 00 00
All code
========
   0:   08 80 3c 02 00 0f       or     %al,0xf00023c(%rax)
   6:   85 22                   test   %esp,(%rdx)
   8:   01 00                   add    %eax,(%rax)
   a:   00 48 8b                add    %cl,-0x75(%rax)
   d:   43                      rex.XB
   e:   40                      rex
   f:   48 8d b8 c8 04 00 00    lea    0x4c8(%rax),%rdi
  16:   48 89 45 d0             mov    %rax,-0x30(%rbp)
  1a:   48 b8 00 00 00 00 00    movabs $0xdffffc0000000000,%rax
  21:   fc ff df
  24:   48 89 fa                mov    %rdi,%rdx
  27:   48 c1 ea 03             shr    $0x3,%rdx
  2b:*  80 3c 02 00             cmpb   $0x0,(%rdx,%rax,1)               <-- 
trapping instruction
  2f:   0f 85 ee 00 00 00       jne    0x123
  35:   48 8b 45 d0             mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rax
  39:   48 83 b8 c8 04 00 00    cmpq   $0x0,0x4c8(%rax)
  40:   00

Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
   0:   80 3c 02 00             cmpb   $0x0,(%rdx,%rax,1)
   4:   0f 85 ee 00 00 00       jne    0xf8
   a:   48 8b 45 d0             mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rax
   e:   48 83 b8 c8 04 00 00    cmpq   $0x0,0x4c8(%rax)
  15:   00
[1181047.981417] RIP unmap_vmas (mm/memory.c:1337)
[1181047.982011]  RSP <ffff880433f078a8>


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to