On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:52:39PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > DM_PARAMS_KMALLOC and DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC should never be set together in > param_flags. We are setting these flags while allocating so we know that > there is almost no chance of having these two set together but still we > can have some additional safety. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org> > --- > drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c > index 80a4395..aaad74e 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c > @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ static void free_params(struct dm_ioctl *param, size_t > param_size, int param_fla > > if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_KMALLOC) > kfree(param); > - if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC) > + else if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC)
Wouldn't you also want a WARN_ON to complain about both flags being set? --D > vfree(param); > } > > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > dm-devel mailing list > dm-de...@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
