Hi Vincent,
On 02/09/15 10:31, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> On 14 August 2015 at 18:23, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmus...@arm.com> wrote:
>> Bring arch_scale_cpu_capacity() in line with the recent change of its
>> arch_scale_freq_capacity() sibling in commit dfbca41f3479 ("sched:
>> Optimize freq invariant accounting") from weak function to #define to
>> allow inlining of the function.
>>
>> While at it, remove the ARCH_CAPACITY sched_feature as well. With the
>> change to #define there isn't a straightforward way to allow runtime
>> switch between an arch implementation and the default implementation of
>> arch_scale_cpu_capacity() using sched_feature. The default was to use
>> the arch-specific implementation, but only the arm architecture provides
>> one and that is essentially equivalent to the default implementation.
[...]
>
> So you change the way to declare arch_scale_cpu_capacity but i don't
> see the update of the arm arch which declare a
> arch_scale_cpu_capacity to reflect this change in your series.
We were reluctant to do this because this functionality makes only sense
for ARCH=arm big.Little systems w/ cortex-a{15|7} cores and only if the
clock-frequency property is set in the dts file.
Are you planning to push for a 'struct cpu_efficiency/clock-frequency
property' solution for ARCH=arm64 as well?
I'm asking because for ARCH=arm64 systems today (JUNO, Hi6220) we use the
capacity value of the last entry of the capacity_state vector for the cores
(e.g. cortex-a{57|53).
To connect the cpu invariant engine (scale_cpu_capacity()
[arch/arm/kernel/topology.c]) with the scheduler, something like this is
missing:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
index 370f7a732900..17c6b3243196 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ void init_cpu_topology(void);
void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid);
const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
+#define arch_scale_cpu_capacity scale_cpu_capacity
+struct sched_domain;
+extern unsigned long scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu);
+
#else
static inline void init_cpu_topology(void) { }
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index 08b7847bf912..907e0d2d9b82 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
*/
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
-unsigned long arch_scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
+unsigned long scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
}
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void update_cpu_capacity(unsigned int cpu)
set_capacity_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
pr_info("CPU%u: update cpu_capacity %lu\n",
- cpu, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu));
+ cpu, scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu));
}
-- Dietmar
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
