On Mon 24-08-15 00:59:39, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <[email protected]>
> 
> When failure occurs and return, vma->vm_pgoff is already set, which is
> not a good idea.

Why? The vma is not inserted anywhere and the failure path is supposed
to simply free the vma.

> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 8e0366e..b5a6f09 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2878,6 +2878,13 @@ int insert_vm_struct(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma)
>       struct vm_area_struct *prev;
>       struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent;
>  
> +     if (find_vma_links(mm, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
> +                        &prev, &rb_link, &rb_parent))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +     if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT) &&
> +          security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, vma_pages(vma)))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
>       /*
>        * The vm_pgoff of a purely anonymous vma should be irrelevant
>        * until its first write fault, when page's anon_vma and index
> @@ -2894,12 +2901,6 @@ int insert_vm_struct(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma)
>               BUG_ON(vma->anon_vma);
>               vma->vm_pgoff = vma->vm_start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>       }
> -     if (find_vma_links(mm, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
> -                        &prev, &rb_link, &rb_parent))
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> -     if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT) &&
> -          security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, vma_pages(vma)))
> -             return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       vma_link(mm, vma, prev, rb_link, rb_parent);
>       return 0;
> -- 
> 1.9.3

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to