On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:29:21PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > During sorting before assign, we only put resource with non-zero align > in the sorted list, so for optional resources that must size is 0 and only > have addon parts, we need to have correct align. > > While treating SRIOV as optional resources, we always read alignment for > SRIOV bars, so they are ok. > Hotplug bridge resources are using STARTALIGN so it is ok when size is 0 > if we have correct start for them. > > Later we want to treat the ROM BAR as optional resource, and it has > have SIZEALIGN, we need to find a way to get align for them.
Are you saying we have a ROM resource where the ROM BAR is of non-zero size, but the resource structure says it's zero size? > We can use addon resource align instead in that case, and it will > be ok for SRIOV path and hotplug bridge resource path. > > Sorted list will contain must resource align/size to 0/0 to hold spot for > optional resources. > > We need to pass realloc_head from sizing stage to sorting stage, and > get entry from realloc list and calculate align from the entry. > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81431 Apparently this fixes a problem? What is the problem? What is the symptom of the problem? > Reported-by: TJ <li...@iam.tj> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 50 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > index 247d8fe..27cb0f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > @@ -145,9 +145,43 @@ static resource_size_t get_res_add_align(struct > list_head *head, > return dev_res->min_align; > } > > +static resource_size_t __pci_resource_alignment( I don't like creating new function names by adding "__" to the beginning of an existing function name. It doesn't give enough of a clue about what how the functions are different. I don't really understand what's going on here, but this might be a clue that this could be refactored differently. > + struct pci_dev *dev, > + struct resource *r, > + struct list_head *realloc_head) > +{ > + resource_size_t r_align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, r); > + resource_size_t orig_start, orig_end; > + struct pci_dev_resource *dev_res; > + > + if (r_align || !realloc_head) > + return r_align; > + > + dev_res = res_to_dev_res(realloc_head, r); > + if (!dev_res || !dev_res->add_size) > + return r_align; > + > + orig_start = r->start; > + orig_end = r->end; > + r->end += dev_res->add_size; > + if ((r->flags & IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN)) { > + resource_size_t r_size = resource_size(r); > + resource_size_t add_align = dev_res->min_align; > + > + r->start = add_align; > + r->end = add_align + r_size - 1; I think this would be slightly shorter and more obvious as: resource_size_t r_size = resource_size(r); r->start = dev_res->min_align; r->end = r->start + r_size - 1; > + } > + r_align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, r); > + r->start = orig_start; > + r->end = orig_end; > + > + return r_align; > +} > > /* Sort resources by alignment */ > -static void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, struct list_head *head) > +static void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > + struct list_head *realloc_head, > + struct list_head *head) > { > int i; > > @@ -165,7 +199,7 @@ static void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > struct list_head *head) > if (!(r->flags) || r->parent) > continue; > > - r_align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, r); > + r_align = __pci_resource_alignment(dev, r, realloc_head); > if (!r_align) { > dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: %pR has bogus alignment\n", > i, r); > @@ -183,8 +217,9 @@ static void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > struct list_head *head) > list_for_each_entry(dev_res, head, list) { > resource_size_t align; > > - align = pci_resource_alignment(dev_res->dev, > - dev_res->res); > + align = __pci_resource_alignment(dev_res->dev, > + dev_res->res, > + realloc_head); > > if (r_align > align) { > n = &dev_res->list; > @@ -197,6 +232,7 @@ static void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > struct list_head *head) > } > > static void __dev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > + struct list_head *realloc_head, > struct list_head *head) > { > u16 class = dev->class >> 8; > @@ -213,7 +249,7 @@ static void __dev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > return; > } > > - pdev_sort_resources(dev, head); > + pdev_sort_resources(dev, realloc_head, head); > } > > static inline void reset_resource(struct resource *res) > @@ -501,7 +537,7 @@ static void pdev_assign_resources_sorted(struct pci_dev > *dev, > { > LIST_HEAD(head); > > - __dev_sort_resources(dev, &head); > + __dev_sort_resources(dev, add_head, &head); > __assign_resources_sorted(&head, add_head, fail_head); > > } > @@ -514,7 +550,7 @@ static void pbus_assign_resources_sorted(const struct > pci_bus *bus, > LIST_HEAD(head); > > list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) > - __dev_sort_resources(dev, &head); > + __dev_sort_resources(dev, realloc_head, &head); > > __assign_resources_sorted(&head, realloc_head, fail_head); > } > -- > 1.8.4.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
