On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:44:27AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > That said, while we don't need special accessors we do need guarantees > that anything that has written to a persistent memory address has done > so in a way that wmb_pmem() is able to flush it. It's more of a "I've > audited this code path for wmb_pmem() compatibility so use this api to > write to pmem."
I'm more worried about things where don't just do plain loads and stores to a pmem region but DMA, which will end up as a nightmare of casts. But we can wait and see how that evolves in the end.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
