On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:08:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.

I'd rather keep it as it documents the expected behavior and double
unlikely should work just fine.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/input/mouse/alps.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> index 113d6f1516a5..cef3611a4ccd 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ static void alps_report_bare_ps2_packet(struct psmouse 
> *psmouse,
>               /* On V2 devices the DualPoint Stick reports bare packets */
>               dev = priv->dev2;
>               dev2 = psmouse->dev;
> -     } else if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->dev3))) {
> +     } else if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->dev3)) {
>               /* Register dev3 mouse if we received PS/2 packet first time */
>               if (!IS_ERR(priv->dev3))
>                       psmouse_queue_work(psmouse, &priv->dev3_register_work,
> -- 
> 2.4.0
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to