On 07/20/2015 04:21 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We're going to have THP mapped with PTEs. It will confuse numabalancing.
> Let's skip them for now.

Fair enough.

Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarc...@redhat.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 074edab89b52..52f6fa02c099 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3186,6 +3186,12 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma,
>               return 0;
>       }
>  
> +     /* TODO: handle PTE-mapped THP */
> +     if (PageCompound(page)) {
> +             pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
>       /*
>        * Avoid grouping on RO pages in general. RO pages shouldn't hurt as
>        * much anyway since they can be in shared cache state. This misses
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to