IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index ca1b362d77e2..f28a1fae5691 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static struct devfreq *find_device_devfreq(struct device *dev)
{
struct devfreq *tmp_devfreq;
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) {
pr_err("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *find_devfreq_governor(const
char *name)
{
struct devfreq_governor *tmp_governor;
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name))) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name)) {
pr_err("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
