Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:21:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:24:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c > > > > + update_stats(&runtime_cycles_in_tx_stats[ctx][cpu], > > > > count[0]);
> > > oops, looks like copy&paste issue.. thanks > > > we now print comment line if the avg is 0, but I think it's ok > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> > > This affects just perf/core, right? > I guess, dont think it's an urgent one.. Andi, please speak up ;-) I'm not talking about it being urgent or not, I'm talking about it being a bug present only in perf/core or if this is something that is in perf/urgent, i.e. affects what is in Linus's upstream tree, etc. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
