Hi Jaegeuk, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 12:11 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: reorganize __f2fs_add_link > > Hi Chao, > > BTW, isn't there any problem on update_inode/mark_inode_dirty stuffs?
Any problem here? > And, is there a hole to write uncompleted node pages unnecessarily? > Yes, the hole can be filled. > > Let me think about this for a while. > > I think two patches are clean-ups with a little bit big changes. > > Currently, we've touched many parts including extent_cache, so I need to > > focus > > on stabilizing them first. > > After then, I'd like to dig two clean-up patches. Ok? It's OK. :) Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
