On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 09:16:58AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2015 09:57, "Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > +
> > +#define STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_INSN \
> > + ".Ltemp" __stringify(__LINE__) ":;" \
>
> This is wrong. It won't work for people who do multiple of these on the
> same line (think macros etc).
>
> For temporary labels, you should just use numeric labels. Think Pascal
> style ones. Then use "b" or "f" after the number when referring to it to
> say "back" or "forward" reference.
>
> So the code for an endless loop with a true temporary label looks like:
>
> 1: code
> jmp 1b
>
> and a branch over would look like
>
> jne 7f
> .. code ...
> 7: ...
>
> and now you can have multiple of these truly temp labels without ever
> getting errors from having a label redefined.
Yeah, I think I'll change the C macro to do that.
However for asm macros you have to worry about collisions. For example:
.macro FOO
1: ...
.endm
1: ...
FOO
jmp 1b
It would jump to "1" in the macro instead of the "1" before the macro.
So for the asm version of the macro I ended up using Andy's idea of using "\@"
to get a unique identifier:
.macro STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_INSN
.if CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
.Ltemp_\@:
.pushsection __stackvalidate_ignore_insn, "a"
_ASM_ALIGN
.long .Ltemp_\@ - .
.popsection
.endif
.endm
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
