On 07/14/2015 12:24 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:29:33 +0900
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> wrote:
Ftace's stack tracer on arm64 returns wrong information about call stacks:
Depth Size Location (50 entries)
----- ---- --------
0) 5256 0 notifier_call_chain+0x30/0x94
1) 5256 0 ftrace_call+0x0/0x4
2) 5256 0 notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x94
3) 5256 0 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x44
4) 5256 0 timekeeping_update.constprop.9+0xb8/0x114
5) 5256 0 update_wall_time+0x408/0x6dc
Most of 'Size' fields are unexpectedly zero.
This is because stack tracer fails to recognize each function's stack frame
in check_stack(). Stack tracer searches for a function's pc in the stack
based on the list returned by save_stack_trace(), but save_stack_trace() on
arm64 does not return the exact return address saved in a stack frame, but
a value decrmented by 4 (which means a branch instruction's address).
This behavior was introduced by
commit e306dfd06fcb ("ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation")
So the matching doesn't succeed in most cases.
This problem can be fixed either by
a) reverting the commit above
b) adding an arm64-specific hack to check_patch()
This patch does b).
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
index 3f34496..7086fc3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
@@ -143,7 +143,11 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
p = start;
for (; p < top && i < max_stack_trace.nr_entries; p++) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+ if (*p == (stack_dump_trace[i] + 4)) {
+#else
if (*p == stack_dump_trace[i]) {
+#endif
Instead of the ugly #ifdef in this code, please add a macro
FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET
Then in include/linux/ftrace.h have:
#ifndef FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET
# define FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET 0
#endif
And in arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
#define FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET 4
And then just do:
if (*p == (stack_dump_trace[i] + FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET)) {
Yes.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
-- Steve
this_size = stack_dump_index[i++] =
(top - p) * sizeof(unsigned long);
found = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/