On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:15:46PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> As since sama5d3, to reset the chip, we don't need to shutdown the ddr
> controller.
> 
> So add a new compatible string and new restart function for sama5d3 and
> later chips. As we don't use sama5d3 ddr controller, so remove it as
> well.
> 
That sounds like it should be two separate patches, or am I missing something ?

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh...@atmel.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c 
> b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> index 36dc52f..8944b63 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ static int at91sam9g45_restart(struct notifier_block 
> *this, unsigned long mode,
>       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
>  
> +static int sama5d3_restart(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
> +                     void *cmd)
> +{
> +     writel(cpu_to_le32(AT91_RSTC_KEY | AT91_RSTC_PERRST | 
> AT91_RSTC_PROCRST),
> +                             at91_rstc_base);
> +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
>  static void __init at91_reset_status(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       u32 reg = readl(at91_rstc_base + AT91_RSTC_SR);
> @@ -155,13 +163,13 @@ static void __init at91_reset_status(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>  static const struct of_device_id at91_ramc_of_match[] = {
>       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc", },
>       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc", },
> -     { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc", },
>       { /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id at91_reset_of_match[] = {
>       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9260_restart },
>       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
> +     { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-rstc", .data = sama5d3_restart },
>       { /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  
> @@ -181,17 +189,21 @@ static int at91_reset_of_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
>  
> -     for_each_matching_node(np, at91_ramc_of_match) {
> -             at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
> -             if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) {
> -                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not map ram controller 
> address\n");
> -                     return -ENODEV;
> +     match = of_match_node(at91_reset_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> +     at91_restart_nb.notifier_call = match->data;
> +
> +     if (match->data != sama5d3_restart) {
> +             /* we need to shutdown the ddr controller, so get ramc base */
> +             for_each_matching_node(np, at91_ramc_of_match) {
> +                     at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +                     if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) {
> +                             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not map ram 
> controller address\n");
> +                             return -ENODEV;
> +                     }
> +                     idx++;
>               }
> -             idx++;
>       }
>  
> -     match = of_match_node(at91_reset_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> -     at91_restart_nb.notifier_call = match->data;
>       return register_restart_handler(&at91_restart_nb);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to