On Wed 08-07-15 20:43:31, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:27:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > @@ -1091,12 +1079,14 @@ bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, > > struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > task_unlock(p); > > } else { > > /* > > - * All threads may have already detached their mm's, but the oom > > - * killer still needs to detect if they have already been oom > > - * killed to prevent needlessly killing additional tasks. > > + * All threads have already detached their mm's but we should > > + * still be able to at least guess the original memcg from the > > + * task_css. These two will match most of the time but there are > > + * corner cases where task->mm and task_css refer to a different > > + * cgroups. > > */ > > rcu_read_lock(); > > - task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(task); > > + task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(task, > > memory_cgrp_id)); > > css_get(&task_memcg->css); > > I wonder why it's safe to call css_get here.
What do you mean by safe? Memcg cannot go away because we are under rcu lock. > > The patch itself looks good though, > > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com> Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/