On 07/03/2015 07:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 03/07/2015 15:12, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you >>>> should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the >>>> vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead. >> For this last one, I don't think this is achievable since if I store the >> vfio_platform_irq in the opaque, it matches irqs[i] of >> vfio_platform_device and I don't have any mean to retrieve "i" when >> calling container_of. > > Right, notice I said "link it": > > struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = > container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer); > struct vfio_platform_device *vpdev = irq->vpdev; > struct vfio_device *vdev = vpdev->vdev; > > Would this be okay?
Yes that's what I did. I added the vfio_device handle in struct vfio_platform_irq Thanks ;-) Have a nice WE Eric > > Paolo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
