> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.au...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:17 PM
> To: eric.au...@st.com; eric.au...@linaro.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> k...@vger.kernel.org; christoffer.d...@linaro.org; marc.zyng...@arm.com;
> alex.william...@redhat.com; pbonz...@redhat.com; avi.kiv...@gmail.com;
> mtosa...@redhat.com; Wu, Feng; j...@8bytes.org;
> b.rey...@virtualopensystems.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
>
> - [add,del]_[consumer,producer] updated to takes both the consumer and
> producer handles. This is requested to combine info from both,
> typically to link the source irq owned by the producer with the gsi
> owned by the consumer (forwarded IRQ setup).
> - new functions are added: [stop,resume]_[consumer, producer]. Those are
> needed for forwarding since the state change requires to entermingle
> actions at consumer, producer.
> - On handshake, we now call connect, disconnect which features the more
> complex sequence.
> - new fields are added on producer side: linux irq, vfio_device handle,
> active which reflects whether the source is active (at interrupt
> controller level or at VFIO level - automasked -) and finally an
> opaque pointer which will be used to point to the vfio_platform_device
> in this series.
> - new fields on consumer side: the kvm handle, the gsi
>
> Integration of posted interrupt series will help to refine those choices
On PI side, I need another filed as below,
struct irq_bypass_consumer {
struct list_head node;
void *token;
+ unsigned irq; /*got from producer when registered*/
void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
+ void (*update)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
};
'update' is used to update the IRTE, while irq is initialized when
registered, which is used to find the right IRTE.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> - connect/disconnect could become a cb too. For forwarding it may make
> sense to have failure at connection: this would happen when the physical
> IRQ is either active at irqchip level or VFIO masked. This means some
> of the cb should return an error and this error management could be
> prod/cons specific. Where to attach the connect/disconnect cb: to the
> cons or prod, to both?
> - Hence may be sensible to do the list_add only if connect returns 0
> - disconnect would not be allowed to fail.
> ---
> include/linux/irqbypass.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/irq/bypass.c | 48
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqbypass.h b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> index 718508e..591ae3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> @@ -3,17 +3,37 @@
>
> #include <linux/list.h>
>
> +struct vfio_device;
> +struct irq_bypass_consumer;
> +struct kvm;
> +
> struct irq_bypass_producer {
> struct list_head node;
> void *token;
> - /* TBD */
> + unsigned int irq; /* host physical irq */
> + struct vfio_device *vdev; /* vfio device that requested irq */
> + /* is irq active at irqchip or VFIO masked? */
> + bool active;
> + void *opaque;
> + void (*stop_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + void (*resume_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> };
>
> struct irq_bypass_consumer {
> struct list_head node;
> void *token;
> - void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> - void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + unsigned int gsi; /* the guest gsi */
> + struct kvm *kvm;
> + void (*stop_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*resume_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> };
>
> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/bypass.c b/kernel/irq/bypass.c
> index 5d0f92b..fb31fef 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/bypass.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/bypass.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,46 @@ static LIST_HEAD(producers);
> static LIST_HEAD(consumers);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
>
> +/* lock must be hold when calling connect */
> +static void connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
> +{
> + pr_info("++++ %s prod(%d) -> cons(%d)\n",
> + __func__, prod->irq, cons->gsi);
> + if (prod->stop_producer)
> + prod->stop_producer(prod);
> + if (cons->stop_consumer)
> + cons->stop_consumer(cons);
> + if (prod->add_consumer)
> + prod->add_consumer(prod, cons);
> + if (cons->add_producer)
> + cons->add_producer(cons, prod);
> + if (cons->resume_consumer)
> + cons->resume_consumer(cons);
> + if (prod->resume_producer)
> + prod->resume_producer(prod);
> +}
> +
> +/* lock must be hold when calling disconnect */
> +static void disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
> +{
> + pr_info("---- %s prod(%d) -> cons(%d)\n",
> + __func__, prod->irq, cons->gsi);
> + if (prod->stop_producer)
> + prod->stop_producer(prod);
> + if (cons->stop_consumer)
> + cons->stop_consumer(cons);
> + if (cons->del_producer)
> + cons->del_producer(cons, prod);
> + if (prod->del_consumer)
> + prod->del_consumer(prod, cons);
> + if (cons->resume_consumer)
> + cons->resume_consumer(cons);
> + if (prod->resume_producer)
> + prod->resume_producer(prod);
> +}
> +
> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
> {
> struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp;
> @@ -38,7 +78,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct
> irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>
> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
> if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
> - consumer->add_producer(producer);
> + connect(producer, consumer);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -56,7 +96,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct
> irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>
> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
> if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
> - consumer->del_producer(producer);
> + disconnect(producer, consumer);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -86,7 +126,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct
> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>
> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
> if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
> - consumer->add_producer(producer);
> + connect(producer, consumer);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -104,7 +144,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct
> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>
> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
> if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
> - consumer->del_producer(producer);
> + disconnect(producer, consumer);
> break;
> }
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
