Hi Matthias
May I double confirm with you that soc node is MUST removed?
If yes, we will upstream dtsi with this format for other new chips.
Thanks.
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 08:15 +0800, Mars Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 22:25 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 07:59:13 PM Mars Cheng wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 21:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > > > + soc {
> > > >
> > > > Please drop the soc node as well and just add the components directly.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Matthias
> > >
> > > May I know the reason to remove the soc node? I follow other xxxx.dtsi
> > > to add this node.
> >
> > The device tree is reflecting the hardware, if you add a soc node like
> > this, it
> > is seen like a bus, but there is not really a bus.
> >
> > I think point of view about this has change over time and nowadays it is
> > preferred not to add a soc node.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> Got it. Will remove the soc node and prepare the new patch.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> linux-media...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
