On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Brian Norris wrote:
> This patch adds a second set of suspend/resume hooks to irq_chip, this
> time to represent *chip* suspend/resume, rather than IRQ suspend/resume.
> These callbacks will always be called for an irqchip and are based on
> the per-chip irq_chip_generic struct, rather than the per-IRQ irq_data
> struct.

There is no per-chip irq_chip_generic struct. It's only there if the
irq chip has been instantiated as a generic chip.
 
>  /**
>   * struct irq_chip - hardware interrupt chip descriptor
>   *
> @@ -317,6 +319,12 @@ static inline irq_hw_number_t irqd_to_hwirq(struct 
> irq_data *d)
>   * @irq_suspend:     function called from core code on suspend once per chip
>   * @irq_resume:              function called from core code on resume once 
> per chip
>   * @irq_pm_shutdown: function called from core code on shutdown once per chip
> + * @chip_suspend:    function called from core code on suspend once per
> + *                   chip; for handling chip details even when no interrupts
> + *                   are in use
> + * @chip_resume:     function called from core code on resume once per chip;
> + *                   for handling chip details even when no interrupts are
> + *                   in use
>   * @irq_calc_mask:   Optional function to set irq_data.mask for special cases
>   * @irq_print_chip:  optional to print special chip info in show_interrupts
>   * @irq_request_resources:   optional to request resources before calling
> @@ -357,6 +365,8 @@ struct irq_chip {
>       void            (*irq_suspend)(struct irq_data *data);
>       void            (*irq_resume)(struct irq_data *data);
>       void            (*irq_pm_shutdown)(struct irq_data *data);
> +     void            (*chip_suspend)(struct irq_chip_generic *gc);
> +     void            (*chip_resume)(struct irq_chip_generic *gc);

I really don't want to set a precedent for random (*foo)(*bar)
callbacks.
 
> +
> +             if (ct->chip.chip_suspend)
> +                     ct->chip.chip_suspend(gc);

So wouldn't it be the more intuitive solution to make this a callback
in the struct gc itself?

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to