On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 13:05 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> So this related to the CONFIG_AS_ symbols for assembly. We really would
> like to do things like actually adding dependencies on assembler or
> compiler support into Kconfig proper, rather than having two independent
> mechanisms. That way we could do, for example:
>
> config RAID6_AVX2
> depends on X86 && AS_AVX2
I have no idea what AS_AVX2 means, sorry. So what would it mean if
someone has a .config with
CONFIG_AS_AVX2=foo
Ie, what would happen if someone using a toolchain for which that would
not be possible tries to build a kernel with that symbol set? That
person's .config would end up containing
# CONFIG_AS_AVX2 is not set
or similar, right?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
